<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Nikon D800 Professional Insights	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.robvanpetten.com/2012/02/06/httpnps-nikonimaging-commembersrob_van_petten/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.robvanpetten.com/2012/02/06/httpnps-nikonimaging-commembersrob_van_petten/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:49:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim		</title>
		<link>https://www.robvanpetten.com/2012/02/06/httpnps-nikonimaging-commembersrob_van_petten/#comment-151</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[	&lt;p&gt;I&#8217;m in need of another Nikon body. And it will be the D800 or the E version. I have been researching the drawbacks of the E but this camera body will be more of a toy than a tool. And I&#8217;m most likely to use it for scenic landscapes and macro imaging. But one question I&#8217;m wondering about the E is if one encounters a situation where moire is likely to be a problem couldn&#8217;t the subject be shot at a lower resolution and avoid the possibility of moire? Or is the E version likely to produce the problem at all resolutions? Thanks for all the information you&#8217;ve shared so far.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>I&#8217;m in need of another Nikon body. And it will be the D800 or the E version. I have been researching the drawbacks of the E but this camera body will be more of a toy than a tool. And I&#8217;m most likely to use it for scenic landscapes and macro imaging. But one question I&#8217;m wondering about the E is if one encounters a situation where moire is likely to be a problem couldn&#8217;t the subject be shot at a lower resolution and avoid the possibility of moire? Or is the E version likely to produce the problem at all resolutions? Thanks for all the information you&#8217;ve shared so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob Van Petten		</title>
		<link>https://www.robvanpetten.com/2012/02/06/httpnps-nikonimaging-commembersrob_van_petten/#comment-152</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Van Petten]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-152</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[	&lt;p&gt;Possibly.  Shooting at a lower res could change the subject to sensor pattern and eliminate the moire, but would be a trial an error test.  If you changed the res you also defeat the purpose of having such a nice big sharp file.  Changing the focal length can impact the moire alinement too.  I have had very little shooting time with an e version and did not run any kind of comparative test.  Also &#8211; the e version I shot was a prototype and may have been developed considerably since then.  I think we should wait and see on some of these questions.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Possibly.  Shooting at a lower res could change the subject to sensor pattern and eliminate the moire, but would be a trial an error test.  If you changed the res you also defeat the purpose of having such a nice big sharp file.  Changing the focal length can impact the moire alinement too.  I have had very little shooting time with an e version and did not run any kind of comparative test.  Also &#8211; the e version I shot was a prototype and may have been developed considerably since then.  I think we should wait and see on some of these questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
